Stacked Bars with different ItemsSource

Hi Rudi,

Please have a look at the Charts / Chart Types / Stacked Bar sample in our samples project.  The "Normal stacking" example in there shows how two series of data can be grouped by year.  

I think that is similar to your scenario, except in yours, you would need five series and the X-grouping would be done by name instead of year.  Think of a series as each thing in a chart that has its own color and legend item.  Thus a series in your example would need to be each one of the 5 income data sets, even if each series has a single item in it.

The code for that "Normal stacking" example should help get you started.

Hi,

thanks for the help. I've used your tips and I can display two "stacked bars", but there are still some problems.

-> I can't change the XAxes name. It's only working when XAxes is an integer, but I want to display a name (...or group by the name, not by the index)

-> I can't customize the XAxes

Here's a example project:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oZQi_54pvLtvQPTfiST_fGDon9sxrwKi/

Hi Rudi,

Thank you for the sample project.  We are looking into the issue and can confirm that this scenario isn't working properly.  We'll post back here once we have an update.

Hi Rudi,

We've made some updates to how XYGroupedAxis handles multiple series to be more like other axis types.  If you write our support email address and mention this thread, we can send you a preview build to test the updates so far.

Hi,

thanks for the solution/dll's. It's working :)

Only thing I noticed: When I use this:

pltActi.XAxes.Add(new XYGroupedAxis() { LabelAngle = -45 })

...and my XAxes is Index

XPath = "Index"

...then the Angle ist still 0. But that's not okay, since XPath = "Name" is working.

Thanks!

Hi Rudi,

I'm glad the update helped.  For the thing you noticed, I think you'd want to replace the XYGroupedAxis with XYDoubleAxis if you are using Index and then the LabelAngle applies.  Index may be forcing a Double-based axis in that scenario since it's a Double value.  But now that Name is working for grouping, you shouldn't run into this anyhow.