Obtaining name of current method editing in editor control

Posted 17 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

Hi Matt,

The best way to do this is if you have an AST of the document, which is what our parser generator for making semantic parsers is good for. So you can write a grammar for any language and the "Simple" language sample is a good example of this.

Once you have an AST, you can take the root node (like a CompilationUnit) and recurse through the children until you hit the method declaration AST node that contains the desired offset. Then you can examine that for which parameters it has, etc.

The .NET Languages Add-on does produce a CompilationUnit for C# so if you use that, all the work is already done for you.

Actipro Software Support

Posted 17 years ago by Matt Adamson

Thanks however I still don't feel much closer to the solution your discussing :)

Can you be more specific please i.e. assuming I've purchased the NET add on and I'm in the line selection changing event how could obtain the AST node containing the method name?

Perhaps there are some specific examples which come with the add on which would help me in this area too?

Many thanks

Matt

Posted 17 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

If you call a line like this at the caret's offset, you can get a CSharpContext:

CSharpContext context = CSharpContext.GetContextAtOffset(syntaxEditor.Document, offset, compilationUnit, projectResolver);

Then with that, there is a CSharpContext.MemberDeclarationNode that returns an IDomMember. That will specify the containing member, and in that, its name.

Actipro Software Support

Posted 16 years ago by Matt Adamson

Hi

Wow it's a long time since I've looked at this response and detail and got around to implementing this :)

In relation to this code, if I am simply loading a single CSharp file which is obviously part of a bigger project and links to many assemblies, what should I pass as the projectResolver member? I.e. I only want support to retrieve member information for a class e.g. if I'm in a method / property / constructor e.t.c. I don't need any intellisense support at all.

Cheers

Matt

Posted 16 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

The other thing you can do is instead of using a context, just get the CompilationUnit and call FindNodeRecursive to find the containing node for the caret offset. So that could be something very low level like an expression. Then do a FindAncestor(typeof(IDomMember) to find a containing IDomMember, if there is one. Also check the containing node to see if it was an IDomMember. So by doing this, you have a reference to the member and did minimal parsing, etc. It would run faster than the context code mentioned above.

Actipro Software Support

Posted 16 years ago by Matt Adamson

Thanks however with code such as this

            private void rightSyntaxEditor_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionEventArgs e)
            {
                CompilationUnit compilationUnit = rightSyntaxEditor.Document.SemanticParseData as CompilationUnit;
                if (compilationUnit != null)
                {
                    IAstNode caretNode = compilationUnit.FindNodeRecursive(rightSyntaxEditor.Caret.Offset);
                    IAstNode anscestor = caretNode.FindAncestor(typeof(IDomMember));
                }
            }

the compilation unit is always null in a C# file. I've start the semantic parser service using the Start method from the main form.

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, but don't know what :)

Posted 16 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

Not sure Matt but if you follow the steps in the "Key steps for getting started" in the .NET Languages Add-on main topic there should always be a CompilationUnit there after the first parse.

Actipro Software Support

Posted 16 years ago by Matt Adamson

Thanks however I've followed that and at a loss as to what to do next

Any help appreciated?

Posted 16 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

As long as you follow those steps exactly, everything should be working. Are you sure you are doing ALL of them, including setting the Document.Filename?

You can also look at our .NET Reflection QuickStart since that is pretty simplistic and does all the getting started steps correctly.

Actipro Software Support

Posted 16 years ago by Matt Adamson

Actually going through the quick start application was of great help, thanks :)

However it's still producing a null reference on the compilation unit. I set the file name property and also set the dotNetProjectResolver reference to the LanguageData property which I hadn't done before, but still the same.

Are there any specific checks in the SemanticParseData property which can cause this to return a null reference?

Posted 16 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

You should always have a CompilationUnit in SemanticParseData even if your document is full of errors, since it has the errors collection. You still must not have something set up properly. I would urge you to again follow all the key getting started steps and look at our sample.

If you still can't get it then perhaps put together small sample project that shows the problem. Chances are you may find your problem doing that too. If not, send it over and we can look.

Actipro Software Support

Posted 16 years ago by Actipro Software Support - Cleveland, OH, USA

Just for anyone reading this, I worked with Matt over email and found he was loading the free dynamic C# language and not the advanced C# language that is part of the .NET Languages Add-on.

Only the language implementation in the .NET Languages Add-on has any built-in AST functionality.

Actipro Software Support

The latest build of this product (v24.1.1) was released 1 month ago, which was after the last post in this thread.

Comments (12)

Add Comment